 |
 |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
| Home |
Volume 2: No. 3, July 2005
Suggested citation for this article: Day MW. Terminology in “Rural
community knowledge of stroke warning signs and risk factors” [letter to
the editor]. Prev Chronic Dis [serial online] 2005 Jul
[date cited]. Available from: URL: http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2005/
jul/05_0040.htm.
To the Editor:
While I appreciate the effort of Blades et al in conducting the valuable research for “Rural Community Knowledge of Stroke Warning Signs and Risk Factors” (1), I believe that respondents to the survey do not necessarily represent rural communities. The authors cite county population densities as justification for using this classification; however, Cascade and Yellowstone counties contain two of the largest cities in the state of Montana. Statistically, the survey would have had to include a disproportionately large number of respondents who live either in the city’s limits or its nearby suburbs. In addition, the authors did not note this as a limitation of the study. A survey using zip codes for small towns (less than 5000 inhabitants) more than 30 miles from a tertiary health care facility would be a more appropriate methodology in determining a true rural community.
Michael W. Day, RN, MSN, CCRN
Outreach Educator and Clinical Nurse Specialist
Northwest MedStar
Spokane, Wash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors’ affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
Privacy Policy | Accessibility This page last reviewed March 30, 2012
|
|
