View Current Issue Issue Archive Archivo de números en español Search PCD Emerging Infectious Diseases Journal MMWR

Volume 1: No. 4, October 2004

LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Differences in Smoking Prevalence Between the Adult Tobacco Survey and the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System

	TABLE OF CONTENTS
	Print this article E-mail this article: Send feedback to editors Download this article as a PDF (131K) You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader to view PDF files.
	Navigate This Article • References • Table

Suggested citation for this article: Ramsey LT, Pelletier A, Knight S. Differences in smoking prevalence between the Adult Tobacco Survey and the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System [letter to the editor]. Prev Chronic Dis [serial online] 2004 Oct [date cited]. Available from: URL: http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2004/
oct/04_0056.htm.

PEER REVIEWED

To the Editor:

Smoking prevalence is a principal outcome for evaluating tobacco-control efforts, but prevalence estimates in New Hampshire differed between two surveys conducted during 2002. Smoking prevalence was 17.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 16.3%–19.5%) in the Adult Tobacco Survey (ATS) and 23.2% (95% CI 21.8%–24.5%) in the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) (absolute percentage point difference = 5.3%; relative percentage difference = 22.8% [5.3%/23.2%]). We examined possible reasons for this observed difference.

The ATS and BRFSS were both developed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The ATS included 103 questions related to knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors regarding tobacco; the BRFSS included 138 questions related to health behavior risk factors, including 11 questions about tobacco, which followed questions on nine other health topics. The same survey research firm administered both surveys, which were population-based, random-digit-dialed telephone surveys of noninstitutionalized adults aged 18 or older. Smoking prevalence for both surveys was determined by the number of persons who had smoked at least 100 cigarettes in their lifetime and were current smokers. The introduction to the ATS informed potential participants that it was a survey on health and tobacco; the BRFSS was introduced as a survey on health and health practices.

The ATS was conducted in August and September with a Council of American Survey Research Organizations (CASRO) response rate of 52.6% and a sample size of 3000; the BRFSS was conducted throughout the year with a CASRO response rate of 53.2% and a sample size of 5039. No monthly variation existed in smoking prevalence within surveys. The demographics of respondents were similar in both surveys (Table) (1,2).

Given the similarities between the surveys, possible causes of the discrepancy in estimated smoking prevalence between the ATS and the BRFSS in New Hampshire are differences in the survey introduction and differences in question placement. One study conducted in California suggested the tobacco-specific introductory statement in the ATS may have caused certain smokers to deny tobacco use (3). State health departments that conduct the ATS and the BRFSS should be aware of potential differences in smoking prevalence between these two surveys and be prepared to address these differences when communicating with the public and policy makers. Further research is needed to determine if differences in smoking prevalence between these two surveys exist in other states.

Leigh T. Ramsey, PhD
New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Atlanta, Ga

Andrew Pelletier, MD, MPH
New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Atlanta, Ga

Susan Knight, MSPH
New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services
Concord, NH

Back to top

References

1. Knight S, Pelletier A , Ramsey L. New Hampshire Tobacco Data, 2003. Concord (NH): N.H. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Community and Public Health, Division of Chronic Disease Prevention, Tobacco Prevention and Control Program; 2003.
2. Anderson L, Knight S, Peterson E. New Hampshire Adult Tobacco Survey, 2002. Concord (NH): N.H. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Community and Public Health, Division of Chronic Disease Prevention, Tobacco Prevention and Control Program, 2003.
3. Cowling DW, Johnson TP, Holbrook BC, Warnecke RB, Tang H. Improving the self reporting of tobacco use: results of a factorial experiment. Tob Control 2003;12:178–83.

Back to top

Table

Demographics of Respondents to Adult Tobacco Survey and Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (Data Unweighted), New Hampshire, 2002

Back to top

The opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors’ affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.  Home  Privacy Policy | Accessibility CDC Home | Search | Health Topics A-Z This page last reviewed March 30, 2012 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion United States Department of Health and Human Services