 |
 |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
| Home |
Volume 2: No. 4, October 2005
| Study Group | Promotora Intervention (PI) | Printed Statewide Intervention (PSI) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline % | Follow-up % | Baseline % | Follow-up % | |
| Latinas | 25.0 | 29.8 | 44.9 | 43.4 |
| Non-Latina whites | 31.7 | 37.8 | 41.2 | 43.9 |
Figure 1. Unadjusted biennial mammogram rates in Colorado during baseline (January 1998–December 1999) and follow-up (January 2000–December 2001) periods for Latinas and non-Latina whites, by intervention.
| Intervention | Baseline | Follow-up |
|---|---|---|
| Promotora intervention (PI) | .36 | .62 |
| Printed statewide intervention (PSI) | 1 | .86 |
Figure 2. Adjusted odds of having a mammogram during baseline (January 1998–December 1999) and follow-up (January 2000–December 2001) periods by intervention for Medicaid-enrolled Latinas in Colorado. Odds calculated using generalized estimating equations (GEE) (interaction time x intervention, P = .07).
| Intervention | Baseline | Follow-up |
|---|---|---|
| Promotora intervention (PI) | .63 | 1.15 |
| Printed statewide intervention (PSI) | 1 | 1.12 |
Figure 3. Adjusted odds of having a mammogram during baseline (January 1998–December 1999) and follow-up (January 2000–December 2001) periods by intervention for Medicaid-enrolled non-Latina whites in Colorado. Odds calculated using generalized estimating equations (GEE) (interaction time x intervention, P = .10).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors’ affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
Privacy Policy | Accessibility This page last reviewed October 25, 2011
|
|
