Comparison timestamp: 2025-05-02 13:49:16 UTC
RestoredCDC URL: http://restoredcdc.org/www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2006/jul/05_0208a.htm
Live cdc.gov URL ↗: https://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2006/jul/05_0208a.htm
RestoredCDC URL: http://restoredcdc.org/www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2006/jul/05_0208a.htm
Live cdc.gov URL ↗: https://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2006/jul/05_0208a.htm
Removed: Line removed from cdc.gov. Specific word removals are highlighted.
Added: Line added to cdc.gov. Specific word additions are highlighted.
Injected:
Line or disclaimer added by RestoredCDC.org.
Unchanged: Line unchanged.
Original site: www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2006/jul/05_0208a.htm | RestoredCDC.org is an independent project, not affiliated with CDC or any federal entity. Visit CDC.gov for free official information. Due to archival on January 6, 2025, recent outbreak data is unavailable. Videos are not restored. Access data.restoredcdc.org for restored data. Use of this site implies acceptance of this disclaimer.[More]About Us Report Bug Compare ContentHomeView Current IssueVolume 3: No. 3, July 2006Issue ArchiveREVIEWA Review of Studies Examining Stated Preferences for Cancer ScreeningArchivo de números en españolThis flow chart reads from top to bottom. The first box at the top describes the first step of the process, “84 Citations Identified by Search.” The second box, below and to the right of the first box, indicates that 61 of these 84 citations were excluded by their abstract or title, 24 because they were not preference studies and 37 because they were not related to cancer screening. The third box, placed under the first box, indicates “23 Citations Reviewed Completely.” The fourth box, below and to the right of the third box, indicates that of these 23 citations, 15 were excluded: 6 were not stated preferences, 1 was not cancer screening, and 8 focused on methods. The fifth box, placed under the third box, describes the final step, “8 Citations Included.”Issue ArchiveFigure. Flow chart of PubMed database search strategy and results.Return to articleArchivo de números en españolSearch PCDEmerging Infectious Diseases JournalMMWRHomeVolume 3: No. 3, July 2006REVIEWA Review of Studies Examining Stated Preferences for Cancer ScreeningThis flow chart reads from top to bottom. The first box at the top describes the first step of the process, “84 Citations Identified by Search.” The second box, below and to the right of the first box, indicates that 61 of these 84 citations were excluded by their abstract or title, 24 because they were not preference studies and 37 because they were not related to cancer screening. The third box, placed under the first box, indicates “23 Citations Reviewed Completely.” The fourth box, below and to the right of the third box, indicates that of these 23 citations, 15 were excluded: 6 were not stated preferences, 1 was not cancer screening, and 8 focused on methods. The fifth box, placed under the third box, describes the final step, “8 Citations Included.”Figure. Flow chart of PubMed database search strategy and results.Return to articleThe opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors’ affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.HomePrivacy Policy | AccessibilityCDC Home | Search | Health Topics A-ZThis page last reviewed October 25, 2011Centers for Disease Control and Prevention United States Department ofNational Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion Health and Human Services
Note: Comparison ignores leading/trailing whitespace
and certain script/tracking codes. Word-level
highlighting (optional above) only applies to changed
lines.