Comparison timestamp: 2025-05-07 02:47:26 UTC
RestoredCDC URL: http://restoredcdc.org/www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/65/wr/mm6528a3.htm
Live cdc.gov URL ↗: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/65/wr/mm6528a3.htm
RestoredCDC URL: http://restoredcdc.org/www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/65/wr/mm6528a3.htm
Live cdc.gov URL ↗: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/65/wr/mm6528a3.htm
Removed: Line removed from cdc.gov. Specific word removals are highlighted.
Added: Line added to cdc.gov. Specific word additions are highlighted.
Injected:
Line or disclaimer added by RestoredCDC.org.
Unchanged: Line unchanged.
Original site: www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/65/wr/mm6528a3.htm | RestoredCDC.org is an independent project, not affiliated with CDC or any federal entity. Visit CDC.gov for free official information. Due to archival on January 6, 2025, recent outbreak data is unavailable. Videos are not restored. Access data.restoredcdc.org for restored data. Use of this site implies acceptance of this disclaimer.[More]About Us Report Bug Compare ContentSkip directly to searchEspañol | Other LanguagesHere's how you knowAn official website of the United States government Here's how you knowMorbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR)Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR)Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC twenty four seven. Saving Lives, Protecting People Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR)SearchSearch Menu Navigation MenuSubmitMorbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR)* MMWR* Reports by Topic* Publications+ BACKPublications+ Weekly Reporto BACKWeekly Reporto BACKPublications Weekly Reporto Past Volumes (1982-2023)o Past Volumes (1982-2024)o Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) Home+ Recommendations and Reportso BACKRecommendations and Reportso BACKPublications Recommendations and Reportso Past Volumes (1990-2022)o Past Volumes (1990-2024)o Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) Home+ Surveillance Summarieso BACKSurveillance Summarieso BACKPublications Surveillance Summarieso Past Volumes (1983-2023)o Past Volumes (1983-2024)o Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) Home+ Supplementso BACKSupplementso BACKPublications Supplementso Past Volumes (1985-2023)o Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) Home+ Archive (1952-1981)+ Notifiable Infectious Diseases+ Notifiable Noninfectious Conditions+ Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) Home* Vital Signs* Visual Abstracts* Podcasts* Continuing Education* MMWR Clinical Pearls* Metrics* For Authors* About+ BACKAbout+ Staff+ Editorial Board+ Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) Home* Subscribe+ BACKSubscribe+ RSS Feed+ Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) Home* Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) HomeMorbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR)Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) HomeNotes from the Field: Rickettsia parkeri Rickettsiosis — Georgia, 2012–2014Weekly / July 22, 2016 / 65(28);718–719Related PagesAnne Straily, DVM1,2; Amanda Feldpausch, MPH3; Carl Ulbrich, DO4; Kiersten Schell4; Shannon Casillas, MPH3; Sherif R. Zaki, MD, PhD5; Amy M. Denison, PhD5; Marah Condit, MS2; Julie Gabel, DVM3; Christopher D. Paddock, MD2 (View author affiliations)View suggested citationArticle MetricsAltmetric:Citations: 16See more detailsViews: 759X (9)Facebook (7)Google+ (1)Mendeley (19)Citations: 17Views: 2,132Views equals page views plus PDF downloadsMetric DetailsFigureRelated Materials* PDF [122K]During 2012–2014, five cases of Rickettsia parkeri rickettsiosis were identified by a single urgent care practice in Georgia, located approximately 40 miles southwest of Atlanta. Symptom onset occurred during June–October, and all patients had a known tick bite. Patients ranged in age from 27 to 72 years (median = 53 years), and all were male. The most commonly reported initial signs were erythema (n = 3) and swelling (n = 2) at the site of the bite. Two patients reported fever and a third patient reported a rash and lymphadenopathy without fever. Other symptoms included myalgia (n = 3), chills (n = 3), fatigue (n = 2), arthralgia (n = 2), and headache (n = 2). Eschar biopsy specimens were collected from each patient using a 4-mm or 5-mm punch and placed in 10% neutral buffered formalin or sterile saline. These specimens were tested by immunohistochemical (IHC) stains, quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assays, or cell culture isolation to determine if there was evidence of infection with a Rickettsia species (1). IHC evidence of spotted fever group rickettsiae was found in the eschar biopsy specimens in all five cases. In four cases, the biopsy specimens were also positive for R. parkeri by qPCR. The fifth case (specimen positive only by IHC testing) was considered a probable R. parkeri case based on clinical signs and symptoms. R. parkeri was grown in cell culture from one specimen from which isolation was attempted. All patients were treated with oral doxycycline (100 mg twice daily) for a minimum of 10 days, and all recovered.R. parkeri, recently recognized as a pathogen of humans, is transmitted by Amblyomma maculatum (Gulf Coast) ticks (Figure). The disease in humans is most commonly characterized by a necrotic, ulcerated, or scabbed lesion at the tick bite site, known as an inoculation eschar (Figure), which is generally followed by the patient experiencing some combination of fever, headache, malaise, and a sparse maculopapular or vesiculopustular rash (1). The first confirmed human infection with R. parkeri was described in 2004; through June 2016, a total of 39 cases, predominantly from the southeastern United States, have been documented in the scientific literature or confirmed by laboratory assays at CDC (2,3). The incidence of R. parkeri rickettsiosis in the United States is unknown. Serological assays currently used to diagnose spotted fever group rickettsial infections lack species-specificity, and there is considerable cross-reactivity among pathogens. It is likely that some, or possibly many, of the approximately 13,500 noncharacterized cases of spotted fever group rickettsioses reported in the United States during 2008–2012 were caused by R. parkeri (4).The identification of five cases of R. parkeri rickettsiosis from one medical practice during a 3-year interval suggests that this disease is underrecognized in Georgia. During 2012–2014, a total of 335 cases of spotted fever group rickettsiosis were reported in Georgia, including 38 from the health district where the urgent care practice is located.* Four cases of R. parkeri rickettsiosis recently were diagnosed by one clinician in southern Mississippi (5), indicating that the disease might be more common throughout the range of A. maculatum than currently realized.The recognized range of A. maculatum has increased considerably during the past 70 years and now includes most states in the southeastern United States (1). Clinicians should suspect R. parkeri rickettsiosis in patients who have febrile illnesses after being bitten by a tick, particularly in patients with an eschar at the bite site. Eschar biopsy samples are the most versatile diagnostic specimen and can be tested by IHC stains, qPCR assays, or cell culture isolation techniques; alternatively, a sterile swab of the eschar can be tested using qPCR and is less invasive than a biopsy (6). These tests are not widely available but can be performed at CDC and some academic hospitals (3). Because different spotted fever rickettsioses vary greatly in severity, species-specific diagnoses provide more accurate determinations of hospitalization and case-fatality rates associated with each disease. Doxycycline is the recommended treatment for all patients with a tickborne rickettsial infection, including R. parkeri rickettsiosis (3). Infection with R. parkeri rickettsiosis and other tickborne rickettsial diseases can be minimized by avoiding contact with ticks and by promptly removing attached or crawling ticks after exposures to tick-infested habitats. Persons should use Environmental Protection Agency–approved repellent products and check themselves, their children, and their pets after spending time in tick-infested habitats (3).TopCorresponding author: Anne Straily, astraily@cdc.gov, 404-718-1422.Top1Epidemic Intelligence Service, CDC; 2Rickettsial Zoonoses Branch, Division of Vector-Borne Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, CDC; 3Georgia Department of Public Health; 4Summit Urgent Care Clinic, Newnan, Georgia; 5Infectious Diseases Pathology Branch, Division of Vector-Borne Diseases, CDC.TopReferences1. Paddock CD, Finley RW, Wright CS, et al. Rickettsia parkeri rickettsiosis and its clinical distinction from Rocky Mountain spotted fever. Clin Infect Dis 2008;47:1188–96. CrossRef PubMed2. Paddock CD, Goddard J. The evolving medical and veterinary importance of the Gulf Coast tick (Acari: Ixodidae). J Med Entomol 2015;52:230–52. CrossRef PubMed3. Biggs HM, Behravesch CB, Bradley KK, et al. Diagnosis and management of tickborne rickettsial diseases: Rocky Mountain spotted fever and other spotted fever group rickettsioses, ehrlichioses, and anaplasmosis—United States. MMWR Recomm Rep 2016(No. RR-2).4. Drexler NA, Dahlgren FS, Heitman KN, Massung RF, Paddock CD, Behravesh CB. National surveillance of spotted fever group rickettsioses in the United States, 2008–2012. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2016;94:26–34. CrossRef PubMed5. Ekenna O, Paddock CD, Goddard J. Gulf coast tick rash illness in Mississippi caused by Rickettsia parkeri. J Miss State Med Assoc 2014;55:216–9. PubMed6. Myers T, Lalani T, Dent M, et al. Detecting Rickettsia parkeri infection from eschar swab specimens. Emerg Infect Dis 2013;19:778–80. CrossRef PubMedTop* Data from the State Electronic Notifiable Disease Surveillance System, Georgia Department of Public Health Epidemiology Section (https://dph.georgia.gov/epidemiology).TopFIGURE. Female (A) and male (C) Gulf Coast ticks (Amblyomma maculatum); (B) necrotic, ulcerated or scabbed lesion at the tick bite site, known as an inoculation eschar; and (D) immunohistochemical stain indicating the presence of a spotted fever group Rickettsia species in the tissueTopSuggested citation for this article: Straily A, Feldpausch A, Ulbrich C, et al. Notes from the Field: Rickettsia parkeri Rickettsiosis — Georgia, 2012–2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2016;65:718–719. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6528a3.MMWR and Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report are service marks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.Use of trade names and commercial sources is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.References to non-CDC sites on the Internet are provided as a service to MMWR readers and do not constitute or imply endorsement of these organizations or their programs by CDC or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. CDC is not responsible for the content of pages found at these sites. URL addresses listed in MMWR were current as of the date of publication.All HTML versions of MMWR articles are generated from final proofs through an automated process. This conversion might result in character translation or format errors in the HTML version. Users are referred to the electronic PDF version (https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr) and/or the original MMWR paper copy for printable versions of official text, figures, and tables.Questions or messages regarding errors in formatting should be addressed to mmwrq@cdc.gov.View Page In: PDF [122K]Last Reviewed: August 24, 2017Source: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention* Syndicate* MMWR* Reports by Topic* Publications plus icon+ Weekly Report plus icono Past Volumes (1982-2023)o Past Volumes (1982-2024)+ Recommendations and Reports plus icono Past Volumes (1990-2022)o Past Volumes (1990-2024)+ Surveillance Summaries plus icono Past Volumes (1983-2023)o Past Volumes (1983-2024)+ Supplements plus icono Past Volumes (1985-2023)+ Archive (1952-1981)+ Notifiable Infectious Diseases+ Notifiable Noninfectious Conditions* Vital Signs* Visual Abstracts* Podcasts* Continuing Education* MMWR Clinical Pearls* Metrics* For Authors* About plus icon+ Staff+ Editorial Board* Subscribe plus icon+ RSS FeedMetric DetailsCloseViewsView data is collected and posted time period. Page views include both html and pdf views of an article.Views since publication* Page Views: 744* Page Views: 2,079* Page Downloads: 15* Page Downloads: 53* Total Views: 759* Total Views: 2,132View ActivityFirst 30 Days Total ViewsCitations: 16Citations: 17AltmetricsClick a source for Altmetric detailsWhat is the Altmetric Attention Score?The Altmetric Attention Score for a research output provides an indicator of the amount of attention that it has received. The score is derived from an automated algorithm, and represents a weighted count of the amount of attention Altmetric picked up for a research output.Close* About CDC* Contact Us* 800-232-4636Facebook Twitter Instagram LinkedIn Youtube Pinterest SnapchatFacebook Twitter Instagram LinkedIn Youtube Pinterest Snapchat RSS* CONTACT CDCContact UsCall 800-232-4636Email Us* ABOUT CDC+ About CDC+ Jobs+ Funding* POLICIES+ Accessibility+ External Links+ Privacy+ Policies+ Web Policies+ No Fear Act+ FOIA+ OIG+ No Fear Act+ Nondiscrimination+ Vulnerability Disclosure Policy+ CDC Archive+ Public Health Publications+ HHS.gov+ USA.gov* CONNECT WITH US+ Youtube+ Snapchat* LANGUAGES+ Español+ 繁體中文+ Tiếng Việt+ 한국어+ Tagalog+ Русский+ العربية+ Kreyòl Ayisyen+ Français+ Polski+ Português+ Italiano+ Deutsch+ 日本語+ فارسی+ English* U.S. Department of Health & Human Services* Accessibility* External Links* Privacy* Policies* Web Policies* FOIA* OIG* No Fear Act* FOIA* Nondiscrimination* OIG* Vulnerability Disclosure Policy* CDC Archive* Public Health Publications* HHS.gov* USA.govContent Credential×This image was edited or created using GenAI (generative artificial intelligence).Our experts review all images in an effort to ensure accuracy and quality before use.Learn more about CDC's usage of GenAI.
Note: Comparison ignores leading/trailing whitespace
and certain script/tracking codes. Word-level
highlighting (optional above) only applies to changed
lines.